jhameia: ME! (Call To Arms)
[personal profile] jhameia
So tonight I revisited a post written by the awesome cycads on "foreign bodies as sexual playgrounds". Namely, the fetishization of foreign women by (mostly white) men.

I've said before, one of the reasons why I don't often discuss my own fetishes is that I don't feel I can own them, because I, as an Asian woman, AM a fetish. Most people don't surf for "white girl porn". They're usually just looking for porn. But "Asian" - ah, that's a specialty genre. It creeps me out when I hear guys drool over how cute Asian girls are (and usually, girls), how Eastern brides (whether or not Asian, sometimes European) are so much more submissive than [America]s.

Tonight, I read a(n admittedly old) comment which perfectly exemplifies all the fucking skeeviness about guys searching for foreign brides:

Right now, I have been hoping to find a nice foreign wife, and I am most interested particular groups. I would be greatly satisfied to find an equally special wife of my own ethnicity, but I want her different ethnicity cultural background to in a way help represent a certain pureness that is not easily obtained.


What is this pureness, cycads asks. Surely you mean 'uniqueness'. Oh no, according to this guy,

The [laugh]….”pureness” I was speaking of is actually all part of my intent to find a girl whose character is is very special. A virtuous woman.


This virtuous woman, who must be specifically from a different ethnicity and heritage because somehow, that enables her to retain her purity? What the hell does her heritage have to do with it, besides his wanting to spread his genetics further afield (ew yuck!)?

Her difference and race is an additional attempt to amplify the idea. Kinda like pulling an angel from the heavens into a land far from their own.


HOLD ON.

....

HOLD ON.

....

OH MY JESUS ALLAH BUDDHA.

Kinda like pulling an angel from the heavens into a land far from their own.

OH, HI, GUY?

We are not your pets and toys.

We do not exist to be shaped and molded by you.

In fact, that is VERY reminiscent of what abusers do to their victims: isolate them from where they belong to, force them to conform to their ideals.

WTF is this? It's so reminiscent of guys who take virgins so they can train said virgins to their own specific tastes. Sure, it makes sense on some level. If you, you know, make the assumption that your partner is not a person who deserves to live and be shaped by her own experiences. If you like your partner to not be her own person when you claim her.

The whole "partner as possession" factor is made of creepiness. I used to think it was hot, but the more confident I become in myself, the more independent I am (and liking it), the scarier this thought is. And it is everywhere.

The worst thing? This is supposed to be ROMANTIC. The whole "average dude wins angel" trope is supposed to be AWESOME and COOL because it shows that WOMEN ARE TOTALLY NOT SUPERFICIAL (no wait, isn't it the OTHER way around???) and that Good Guys Win the Girl!

Sick sad Nice Guy™ Waiting To Happen backpedals:

It’s clear you may not have immediately understood that I didn’t mean by force and I didn’t literally mean “pulling”. I simply mean just earning the company of someone by “drawing” their attention or interests to oneself.


My response? It is clear you do not come even close to comprehending just how goddamn problematic that framing is. It doesn't matter that you didn't mean that literally. Either way, if that is what you mean, you are filled with Communication Fail.

The company of women is not something to be "earned". By saying that, you frame women as something to be "earned", thus as trophies, as objects to be won. Ergo, as objects.

It is clear you do not even realize you have echoed the sentiments of abusers who isolate their victims, taking the latter from places of comfort for the former's amusement (or sense of control). Or maybe you do realize it and you're just backpedaling.

It is clear you do not even see how you have Other'd cultures different from your own, and women in general.

It is also damned clear you are a Nice Guy-ism™ waiting to happen.

Hell, you know what, I don't even care what you meant.

Attitudes like that are poisonous to both men and women, setting up impossible standards, boxing people into specific codes of behaviour which we could all do without. I am NOT an exotic foreign bride waiting to enter into your life and give you the happiness you oh-so-long-for - neither is ANY OTHER WOMAN, whether Asian or not.

Women aren't trophies, dammit. We're not the fucking Stanley Cup, we're not something you EARN like a fucking salary to keep you alive, we're not something you turn tricks for so you can get our attention. We're people. Stop talking about us like we're not.

*stabbities*

FREE ADVICE

Date: 2009-09-02 09:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tariq-kamal.livejournal.com
I learned a lesson from [livejournal.com profile] hanishoney early on in my relationship with her.

When you've fucked up, you apologize quickly, and try to fix the problem.

You do not spend time beating yourself up in front of the wronged person, or groups or persons you have wronged. You apologize, try and find out what you've done wrong, and then, fix it. Which sometimes means, you know, what? Leaving. And learning.

When you start beating your self up, you're telling the person you've wronged that you're still thinking about how wrong you were -- in short, thinking about yourself.

In short: Stop beating yourself up.

Re: FREE ADVICE

Date: 2009-09-02 01:26 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Beating myself up? Uhh...yeah..??? Well yeah, that's right about apologizing, if you've completed messed up, you apologize and make corrections. To say I'm sorry, is to admit your wrong doing. However, if I didn't then I should not apologize, but can still give an explanation of what may have been misunderstood and why. So I'll only apologize when I mess up. And I have, but of course, seems like everything even my apology won't keep me from being attacked for nothing.

Re: FREE ADVICE

Date: 2009-09-02 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
If you have to keep explaining this much, bub, clearly this lies more on the side of you messing up than everybody else 'misunderstanding'.

So I'll only apologize when I mess up.
You honestly still think you haven't?

And I have, but of course, seems like everything even my apology won't keep me from being attacked for nothing.
So because you think the flood of well-deserved ire will not be abated even by a sincere apology, you're going to take the chickenshit route and not risk apologizing. Can't take the knocks you deserve? Totally lacking stones, dude.

Re: FREE ADVICE

Date: 2009-09-05 06:35 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Well yeah, that's right about apologizing, if you've completed messed up, you apologize and make corrections. To say I'm sorry, is to admit your wrong doing. However, if I didn't then I should not apologize, but can still give an explanation of what may have been misunderstood and why. So I'll only apologize when I mess up. And I have, but of course, seems like everything even my apology won't keep me from being attacked for nothing.

Said what I had to say.

Re: FREE ADVICE

Date: 2009-09-05 03:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tariq-kamal.livejournal.com
You've messed up. People are upset with you. They've told you why. At the very least, the admission that what you said could have been misconstrued, and that you are sorry for the upset caused, would have gone a long way.

You haven't even done a fauxpology -- even Republicans do better than you. Fuck, even the local politicians in the tinpot dictatorship where I am do better than you.

And if you think that you can still do all of the above: sorry mate. Too fucking late.

You insist that you've done no wrong! People disagree! You disagree with them!

Why are you still here? Agree to disagree, and get the fuck out!

Re: FREE ADVICE

Date: 2009-09-05 06:52 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Uhhm, there was an apology waaaaay earlier, but of course that's not gonna stop a wrongful, unsupported accusation especially, when I'm gonna be apologizing for something I didn't do. I insist that I done no wrong?[laugh]...I was accused as the HATED enemy before I was INVITED to come and give recognition to the accusations made. Hard to say, "I wouldn't do it" when everyone else in the room are convinced because of their past and current experiences with liars who say the same good things I say. Let me still ill words from the liar and I will make it much harder. Let me use my own good words, and no ill words from the liar, and I will still be the enemy. Hard to make trust with words. So what's left is actions. Fauxpology...[laugh]...Sorry, wouldn't want to be deceptive. No where have I or will I try to create subliminal messages, which is what many think I have been with the things like the "trophy" idea, I straightened that out, but only to find that it wouldn't matter since what I said would only work for someone who believes in something, especially themselves. I'm not gonna say their name though. No thanks for that advice.

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12 131415161718
19 2021222324 25
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios