jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
Have you ever wondered what it'd be like to die?

No, it's not me being suicidal, just clinical curiousity - what IS it like to die? Is it like a big white light which more or less constantly shines in your eye or is it something more like when we're asleep and we go through a series of dreams? Or just blackness?

I wonder if people are ever aware of the exact time they die. Do they feel their last breath slipping away, the light going out, the loss of sensation in their limbs? Is it like falling asleep? If it's a violent death, is it a blinding sharp pain and then nothing? What is that instant like?

In Buddhism, Theravadan Buddhism at least, we are taught that the body is constantly moving at an extremely fast rate .... to represent it visually, it would look like this:

..............................................................

As a person dies, it slows down:

......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

And so on.

What are those moments like? When brainwave patters slow down... does the person feel anything? Or does everything slow down just like the brain? Maybe the conscious mind doesn't register anything after that.

I've been watching a lot of TV and lately there've been a lot of portrayals of death. Only Dead Like Me actually discusses the possibility of an afterlife, and EVEN THEN - while the Reapers gallivant around getting souls, none of these episodes actually depict what happens after the soul has moved on. There's just this very shiny scene and then nothing. All it does is follow the Reapers around in the living world. It gets old after a while.

(Plus, the only great thing about that show is Mandy Patinkin, because I think he's awesome. I like the comedy and all, but man, the main narrating character is a pain in the ass.)

And what's it like to be a ghost? That must suck, just wandering around in the same place all the time, and not even being aware of being dead - wait, how do we know that ghosts don't know they're dead? Some of them MUST know. Why else would you have friendly-type ghosts who don't harbour malevolent feelings towards the living? How does one retain knowledge of one's own death after there's no more physical body to process the information? IS the physical body needed to process new information?

This is, of course, assuming that the body is the hardware needed to process consciousness - which obviously isn't the case with some ghosts who show full consciousness of their own existance. What then, are brainwaves? What happens when brainwave activity is low?

I watched this great Cantonese movie once and I can't remember what it's called. Basically, it's about this old woman who initially wants to die, but after a field trip with other old folks, she meets a man in white, and she says, "give me ten more years and I promise I'll appreciate every moment." A host of wonderful and bad things happen to her family during the next few days until the end, when the man in white returns, and when she says "I thought I said ten years" he says "one day in heaven is a year on Earth."

Her eldest son (with whom she shares several flashbacks) is starting to realize his mother isn't what she is when he is called to the hospital, to find her in the hospital bed, and the doctor tells him, "her brainwave activity is ten times the usual rate for a normal human being." (The movie ends with both of them reconciling their less-than-satisfactory lives and realizing their worth to each other, and he gets a call, and he knows it's the hospital's news, and she says, "let me go. Pick up the phone." The next shot is him in the room without her. The scene shifts to the hospital where his sister's newborn baby is in the observation nursery, and while the entire family waves to it and says hello and all that fun stuff you do with babies behind the window, the son can feel his mother with them.)

ANYWAY, the point is, what DOES happen if brainwave activity is high? Does it mean a heightened sense of consciousness? A lot of thinking, more than what the average human does? And if it's low, it just means little brain activity, does it mean, "close to death"? How is the consciousness determined by the body - or does the consciousness determine the body's activity? As long as the "soul" (for lack of a better term) remains in the body, it's alive? Can the soul leave the body and the body remain alive? Would that accurately explain brain-dead people?

In The Redemption of Althalus, the title character thinks that "crazy people are just people who were past their time to die. It would drive anybody crazy, still being alive when they're supposed to be resting peacefully in their graves." (BTW, have I said yet that David Eddings is the shiznit? No? Well, he is.)

I think that this is the pivotal tie-in between science and spirituality - if we could understand how the both of them are linked to each other, there would be a greater understanding of the processes of death AND life. There has to be some sort of link, some way of qualitatively measuring (instead of merely quantitatively the way we so often do).
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
I've spoken time and again about the concept of impersonality in R. W. Emerson's writings to my professor, who finds the concept fascinating, and he has tried time and again to impress on us the importance of impersonality, coupled with the risks of getting too involved. Essentially, the key of impersonality is to become so selfless that the self can encompass anything - everything can be appreciated and loved equally because it all has inherent goodness.

There're, of course, several points where this simply is incommensurable - if you want to be impersonal, then how alive are you? The contemplative life has always been comparable to death - a state of complete stillness to comprehend the cosmos. It's an extremely Buddhistic concept, which I never reconciled myself with.

I don't believe the concept of impersonality helps make a person become a human being - if anything, it lends itself to the concepts of post-humanism with its question of "what is human? Can we be completely impersonal and still be human?" My simple answer is no. Human nature likes to find out about things, it likes to change things in its environment, it likes to experiment, and it doesn't just "let things be", because if we did that, we wouldn't really be any much different than animals.

Impersonality, I believe, also leads to the huge post-modern problem of alienation. We see this all the time, especially with the burgeoning technological advances we make. We don't have to go to the bank and see a real bank teller anymore, because we can do it online. We don't babysit our own kids, we make them sit in front of the television. We don't go out and make friends, we make them online.

Don't get me wrong, the Internet is wonderful. It helped me grow up as a person because I met so many types of people that I never would have met otherwise. But for some, it becomes a dependency because they become too afraid to go out and see who's in their immediate vicinity, and partake of emotional bonds safely behind a screen. (This doesn't include people who become very emotionally bonded to their online friends.) But do we really partake of life if we remain faceless beings behind a screen?

That, in itself, is a form of impersonality - we don't necessarily participate in other people's lives, we just sit back and observe. We oftimes don't pass judgement, because we're not there.

Simply put, impersonality can lead to alienation, a highly uncomfortable human state. There're people who achieve impersonality and are perfectly content with it (I won't say happy, because the word "happy" implies a certain extreme). They're content to just sit back and do nothing, and let the world unfold itself. But I don't think, for most part, that all humans are capable of this.

Alienation is a problem of mine and I know a lot of other people share this too. That is why, I think, it's a dangerous thing to tout impersonality as a good thing. So here's a song that depicts my sense of alienation - David Bowie's Space Oddity.


Ground control to Major Tom
Ground control to Major Tom
Take your protein pills and put your helmet on

Ground control to Major Tom
Commencing countdown, engines on
Check ignition and may God's love be with you

Ten, nine, eight, seven, six, five,
Four, three, two, one, liftoff

This is Ground Control to Major Tom
You've really made the grade
And the papers want to know whose shirts you wear
Now it's time to leave the capsule if you dare

This is Major Tom to Ground Control
I'm stepping through the door
And I'm floating in a most peculiar way
And the stars look very different today

For here
Am I sitting in a tin can
Far above the world
Planet Earth is blue
And there's nothing I can do

Though I'm past one hundred thousand miles
I'm feeling very still
And I think my spaceship knows which way to go
Tell me wife I love her very much, she knows

Ground Control to Major Tom
Your circuit's dead, there's something wrong
Can you hear me, Major Tom?
Can you hear me, Major Tom?
Can you hear me, Major Tom?
Can you....

Here am I floating round my tin can
Far above the moon
Planet Earth is blue
And there's nothing I can do.
jhameia: ME! (Plot Bunny)
So Dawn and I kinda sparked a huge discussion for Dr. McLeod to think about for the next time he has a writing class. Basically, our stories were based on pre-existing universes, although Dawn's story could be even more standalone than mine was (hers was FF IX fanfiction, mine was set in the Forgotten Realms universe). None of the workshop people understood this and I suppose I could have done better with a disclaimer, except that I'd do that on a website where it would be public, whereas the workshop seemed like a smaller group that wouldn't quibble about copyright issues. Bad idea.

I think the problem could have been solved quite easily with a disclaimer, but Dr. McLeod went off on a tangent on originality and creativity and negotiating with a pre-conceived universe. He was also shocked to learn that Chewbacca died some Star Wars novels back. I don't think I've ever found the exclaimation "CHEWBACCA DIED???" more hilarious.

It's just plain difficult in general for a workshop class like that to negotiate with any sort of genre, because one needs to have knowledge of certain genres in order to make certain judgement calls on realism and acceptability. There're conventions to be followed and while it's certainly acceptable to break them, the story as a whole has to cohere - a lot of fantasy writers either fall into the rut of writing within the conventions, most of which now consist of stock characters or dilemmas or quests, or they end up trying to break the conventions with the disastrous results of the story not making any bloody sense. (Or both.)

EITHER WAY... in the short story world at least, genre is really looked down upon whereas non-genre stuff is more exalted, possibly because non-genre is so much more accessible to more people than genre. Normally we wouldn't even have to question convention of genre because the environment we write in encourages the writing of literary fiction that has no real genre.

Dawn and I, though, quite stubbornly insist on writing within genre and our writing caused a furor because not only did we write within the conventions of a genre, we were also writing within the conventions, rules and limitations of a pre-conceived universe, and most of our classmates were not prepared to meet us in that plane of writing, so to speak (sorry, bad pun). They got really confused over whose idea is whose, and who gets credit for certain ideas.


The point of this entry is: If you're going to be taking ENGL 3316 (or whatever the code of this class is) and you're going to write within a pre-conceived universe where certain creative elements are not yours, throw in a disclaimer so no one's taken for a loop.

All said and done, I was really happy with the Forgotten Realms story I wrote and I'm going to polish it some more and send it to TSR at some point.
jhameia: ME! (Joline)
That's a line from Nightmare Before Christmas, which I think perfectly wraps up the sentiments of a lot of people I meet who don't understand the purpose or point of poetry. In Democrative Individualism today, we discussed the "conversation of life".

Basically speaking, a conversation is just a group of different voices coming together and exchanging discourse. It doesn't have to be debate, or argument, or information. Conversation is just for its sake, in fact.

Oakshotte discusses the different voices involved in the conversation of life, and how he feels that it is predominantly the voice of practical activity and the voice of science that currently prevails, if not simply dominates, while the voice of poetry is left on the wayside.

It was completely easy for me to understand why the voice of poetry is important. Poetry delights us simply by being there. (In this sense, poetry includes all sorts of creative activity: painting, sculpting, writing, drawing, all that stuff. We normally label it "art".) It has no real practical use, unless you count Sir Philip Sidney's argument that because it delights, it's got more potential to open up its listener to the lessons within it.

So some of us in class were trying to parse the idea of conversation without a point behind it, and one of us said, "If it's just talking for the sake of talking, well, of course that won't happen, I don't have the time for it." And Arthur (the oldest in the class, he's a grandfather now, retired from the Navy but still wears his uniform and goes to work there) said, "Well, you gotta MAKE time!"

And we do have to make time! It's a hard thing to do, of course. Personal relationships are perhaps the hardest thing in the world to keep up.

The problem with the voice of practical activity too, is that it's so predominant that it shuts out other voices, and in the end other voices don't speak out because it's improper for them to. Look at us now: we're so used to thinking that business industries are what we should be working in, or science industries, that parents frown on kids who want to pursue more artsy careers, because it "doesn't make money" and the measure of happiness or success is how useful a person is.

Then we moved on to poetry and how so many people have a problem with poetry, because they're doing nothing but trying to find out "what it means". What do we do when we study poetry in class? We try to find out what the context of it was, what it symbolizes, what its themes are, what impact it had. It's not that we find actual enjoyment in the thing, it's because if we don't try finding out something we don't get brownie points in class.

We forget that poetry is oftimes meant for its own sake. That sometimes, it has no point, and it has no beginning to which it will go towards an end. It is an image, a point of contemplation, to make us stop and rest in it for a while.

Dr. Heckerl really hit deep when he said, "what other activity do we indulge in that Oakshotte talks about that has no real practical use, and that we enjoy for their own sakes?" and when no one answered, he said, "friendship and love. When you love someone, you just delight in them for what they are. You don't just think about their usefulness to you, do you?"

So, here's a poem which I think describes what we were trying to get at in class: Archibald Macleish's Ars Poetica

A poem should be palpable and mute
As a globed fruit,

Dumb
As old medallions to the thumb,

Silent as the sleeve-worn stone
Of casement ledges where the moss has grown--

A poem should be wordless
As the flight of birds.

*

A poem should be motionless in time
As the moon climbs,

Leaving, as the moon releases
Twig by twig the night-entangled trees,

Leaving, as the moon behind the winter leaves,
Memory by memory the mind--

A poem should be motionless in time
As the moon climbs.

*

A poem should be equal to:
Not true.

For all the history of grief
An empty doorway and a maple leaf.

For love
The leaning grasses and two lights above the sea--

A poem should not mean
But be.

Snow

Jan. 15th, 2007 03:35 pm
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
It's snowing right now. I'm at work, I'm sleepy, I don't really want to go to class, but I do want to see Sean, and I'll see him after class, and it's snowing outside.

It's actually a pretty heavy snow session right now. it's mostly been a bit of snow followed by rain which totals out the snow. It's a good kind of snow though. It's soft and fluffy, and a little wet, and it stays on the ground, and it's falling down quite well without any wind blowing it around too much.

I can't imagine a more beautiful sight right now (well, maybe Sean sitting next to me watching it too) and it's got such a calming, soothing effect, I really want to go to bed.

I want to go out in it and frolick. That's what I really want to do. Gosh. The snow's so beautiful. I'm quite inarticulate right now.
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
The other night I decided I really don't like people who bitch about their problems and about other people they come in contact with a great deal, yet do nothing to actually make their lives better. They'll deal with the problems they face, of course, they'll talk to people they know, they will survive.

But they will not actually go out of their way to improve their lives. If they meet something they think is cool, they will depend on the setting that they meet this person in to talk to them. It's always about coincidence and hoping to be able to run into each other. It's not about actually caring enough to call one another up, and setting up a time to meet.

These are the people who will let shit happen to them, and they don't necessarily arrange their lives in such a way to either avoid the bullshit that happens, or to deal with it in a positive manner. No, they will sit there and complain incessantly about how it's such a bad deal, and how it's a bad time, and there's this constant aura of helplessness around them.

These are not helpless people! They are perfectly capable of taking their own initiative to fix their own lives! They are not handicapped in any specific way except by their own flaws which they can fix!

"You have all the power in the world, if you dare look for it" ~ Molly Grue, to Schmendrick

So that got me thinking about a lot of things that I wish I could just tell people to think about, and it kept hopping from one thing to another, and I thought, maybe I could write a column filled with homey self-help advice.

Of course, it wouldn't be homey, knowing me, it would be brutal, awful, and everybody would think I was a self-righteous prick.

...

I should do it.

Moonlight

Oct. 6th, 2006 10:23 pm
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
When I first moved off-campus with Sam, the moonlight would fall into my room at certain points of the year, and I remember the first time I saw it I was so impressed and so excited, I told Sam about it right away. Sam, being her usual blase self, said, "of course it's moonlight. What else could it be?"

The first time I'd ever seen really natural moonlight was when I went to visit my grand-aunt Grace in Oregon, in 1994. She had a farm far out away from any town, and my brother, father and I slept in the same room. One night, while entering the room, I saw this white, bright, light on the floor, and I remember it was so luminous I was scared and convinced it was a ghost. My father laughed at me, told me it's moonlight, and proceeded to walk into the room with me to the window where it came through. I remember marvelling at the shadow, at how stark the light was, the amazing contrast.

I took a walk on a beach in 1995, with my Auntie Honey. It was a holiday to the east coast and we stayed in a little chalet by the sea, and at night I thought it would be nice to go for a walk with her along the beach. So we did, and I noticed the faint moonlight on the beach, took note of the shadows under us.

In so many populated areas, where lampposts are considered to be a good because then it lights up streets, there is so much light, not a whole lot of natural light gets through. I saw the moon out, to be sure, but if I looked out my window, I'd see so much light. I think it counts as a kind of pollution, even, because it kind of messes up the local ecology, having so much light.

In this apartment, I get the moon in my room often, particularly during summer. I had a white blanket during summer, and I love to look at how the moon illuminates my blanket.

Tonight, it's doing the same. The past few days have been rainy, but as if to make up for it, the full moon of the month is amazingly, heartbreakingly beautiful, perfectly round and richly bright. It just pours in.

I've been laying on the bed with all the lights off, just staring up at the moon. It's such a serene sight. It says nothing, but it looks so profound.

I always wonder what the moon is thinking.

The last time I marvelled at the moon like this, I had someone with me. We gazed up and made pithy comments about how beautiful it was, how we take it for granted, how we don't notice these things. Then we fell silent and spent one moment looking at it some more.

I wish it was the same now.

It's a shame how we don't notice these natural wonders anymore, or when we do, we pay it a passing note and then move on with our lives.

I'd like another night like this sometime soon.
jhameia: ME! (Call To Arms)
Ever since I cut my hair, I've been feeling dissatisfied with myself. I wasn't ready to go for a huge change like that, for one. I feel like it should have been a more special occasion, a better reason, like the beginning of a new life for me. A bigger fanfare should have accompanied it, not the quiver of excitement that I got from the few friends surrounding me at the time, and my best friend wasn't even there to witness it (nor did she get excited at all when I told her about it, and I had to approach her with the pictures rather than she asking me because I guess she doesn't care as much these days).

Secondly, for such a drastic cut, and a huge step of dyeing my entire head, it's not a very great colour. It's a nice brown, to be sure, and it's got lighter brown layers. It's - well, it's nice. But it's not fabulous. I feel like a regular person dyeing their hair some other colour that's close to their natural colour but not quite, and that's just silly. The problem with dyeing is that if one really likes the colour, one has to maintain it, and that's about forty to fifty dollars every few months. It's a little annoying, personally.

Thirdly, for a drastic cut and dye-job, nothing really permanently beautiful was done to it. The reason why I stuck with long hair was because my hair's naturally straight, and I figured that if I could never pull off the curly-haired diva (because perms are never permanent), I could do the long-haired elegant diva. Hence why I stuck with it. But now with it short, I could supposedly do more with it, but how could it matter when the next day it just goes back to what it was? I could texture my hair, but that's $150 a year to keep curly. Not to mention I've busted that amount of money on curling products (curlers of different kinds, gels, and a hairdryer) for the sake of curls.

Then there is the realization that yes, in fact, people can fuck with my appearance. While I do like playing Little Dollie once in a while, I realize that once I get into acting and theatre, and if I do get into modelling, what people see is what they can control. This is an uncomfortable fact: my hair, which I previously thought was my own and something no one can fuck with, apparently is not out of bounds for criticism.

Because of all this, I've been feeling... guilty. For being vain. This has never happened before. Before this, I could check myself out in the mirror and I'd see humour in being vain. But this is me going out of my way to be beautiful in my own ideal and when I don't succeed I end up feeling like I'm defeated, somehow. Then when I do succeed, after the initial euphoria I feel bad for having actually spent so much effort in being vain.

It's like I spent so much time building up a mask and I'm proud of it, when I should be proud of who / what I am without the mask.

It doesn't help when people seem to love how I look now. That my hair is healthier looking doesn't seem to mean anything to me since I can't really see it. That I look nicer with makeup on makes me feel like I constantly need enhancers just to be seen as pretty. It's like I need to put effort into making people like what they see. I don't understand how this works when I've never felt this way before.

Just as I was sick of people telling me that "my hair's too long, get it cut", so am I now sick of "your hair's so pretty now". As much as it's positive attention, I'd like it to be for something that I chose for myself: shoulder-length, straight (boring) brown hair isn't what I bargained for.

Therefore, I shall take advantage of Melanie's offer of a free re-colouring job. I'm going to get my head coloured a very deep violet and layered with magenta. I was looking at the colour swatches while at Stanhope the other day and I'm terrifically excited about that.

I am also going to get some more product to hold my hair in place whenever I curl it myself (pillow rollers are actually really good) and I'm still going to experiment with the other curlers I've bought.

I am going to stop reaching for the damned foundation everytime I'm at the mirror.

I have already done something that adds a piece to myself, something that no one could ever possibly fuck with, EVER, and if they try to, I will personally cut them off from my life very violently (in a verbal sense). More on this later, and I promise it'll be awesome.
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
The other day I had a bit of a nightmare. In this world, there were some set rules in place - completely arbitrary, and somewhat without reason. I dreamt I broke one of the rules (I don't recall ever being clear on exactly WHAT I did), and I was sitting in a circle of the council that had the unfortunate responsibility of telling me that I was going to be executed.

I got angry at first. Firstly, I didn't even know the rules existed, and no one saw it fit to educate me, as part of the mass public, what they were. Secondly, I hadn't even known I broke it. It was apparently an aside I did, either by complete accident, or I was forced to do it by extenuating circumstances.

Keeping these two first point in mind, I then got angry, saying, "that's not fair. I didn't know about the rules, and I didn't even know I did it. Why do I have to die for something so arbitrary? Why do I have to be executed for a rule that doesn't make sense?

One of the council members sighed, "I wish they wouldn't say 'it's not fair', of course it isn't."

I argued some more, "It's not fair because it means our lives are meaningless. It means all the time I've spent trying to be a good person, doing good, helping others be good, was all a waste because of this one little thing I've done that I didn't even mean to do, and I never meant for it to be bad. My life is rendered meaningless by this execution, and my death won't be satisfying."

For a long time, I figured that my death would be satisfying, because I've done as much as I can so far in my life, and while I wish I could do more, I can't really complain. I've said my I Love Yous and my I Cares, and I've made it clear to people what they've meant to me, and I've said what good I've been given to me. I've acknowledged my flaws and come to peace with most of them, so I think I'll die reasonably happy. So I was surprised at my reaction in the dream, getting angry because it wasn't fair that I had to die so soon, for such a petty thing. Tomorrow I might die in a stupid-ass accident - am I going to get angry at that? Shit happens like that.

Now that I think about it some more, it wasn't about the fact that I died breaking a rule. It wasn't just because it was a stupid-ass rule. It wasn't that I had done my best to be good and I wasn't recognized for it.

It was because if I died, it wouldn't make a difference: the rule would still be in place, inflicted on other people who might make the same mistake I did. It's stupid because that kind of law is the kind which is made by man, and thus changeable. Everything is mutable, and laws like that should change as well, but my death wouldn't be able to change anything. It meant my entire death was determined by this one law, and it wouldn't even be my fault that my death was meaningless.

Death should have a meaning: whether it's just a natural passing on from life, or whether it is a lesson learnt. Maybe it would be catalyst for change. If we were to die, we should be remembered for our lives, because I think our lives give our death some meaning.

If I were to die today by some injustice, would it matter to anyone?
Would my death be a catalyst for a cause?
If I were to die in the future naturally, to whom would it matter? Would my life be looked at as something to admire? Or would we be too caught up in grief? I would hope the former, and not the latter. It's a sad thing to be caught up in grief, and not move on. I should like to live a good life, and die a good death.

An unjust death that no one takes responsibility for would just be an awful way to go. But a just death that no one needs to be sorry for would be perfect.

Profiles

Aug. 20th, 2006 12:16 pm
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
So I was editing my MySpace Profile, for no particular reason other than to pass the time, and I think I rather like what I wrote about myself. I normally don't like writing stuff like because I end up with this contrived, simplified version of me, but as contrived as it sounds, as pretentious as it looks... I rather like this new summary of me. Anybody who looks down at me for being a poser can sod off.




Foundation: At basic, I am brutal, blunt, practical. I am driven, and I know my limits. I will not take personal bullshit from people. I cut out things I dislike deeply. While I get along with a lot of people, my standards are high, and these standards exist to keep me happy. I get pretty bitchy at times.

<Humanity: I believe in being honest. I believe in skill and aesthetic senses. I believe that everyone has a story to tell, and while I will make blanket statements (such as, Asians Piss Me Off), I am willing to give the individual a chance to tell their story. I judge superficially, but if a person is doing what they want because they want to, and they're having fun, and they're not hurting anybody, I rarely, if ever, have anything bad to say about them. I respect those who are self-aware, and thus aware of others, and of the entire human race.

Sexuality: My sexuality is more sensuality-based. I believe that sex is a basic instinct of people that should not be denied. To learn about one's body and its capabilities is important. I respect the sexual act as a union between its participants for one brief, wonderful moment.

Ideals: The world is a chaotic place. HAIL ERIS. The key is to find my place in this eye of the storm. I will take along Love, Beauty, and Words with me. I can't change the fact that this is an absurd world, meaningless, random, confusing. But I can give myself meaning: to be capable of affection, of depth, of giving.

So sprinkle us with fairy dust.

jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
So I was considering the life of a person in paralysis. What would it be like to live the life of a person who has perfect mental faculties, but couldn't move? Would it be better to have known the life of a person who could move first, or worse to know that life of the body has been completely taken away, for whatever reason?

By paralyzed, I mean, unable to speak or move, but capable of hearing, processing thought, maybe seeing and smelling, tasting, feeling sensations.

That, in my world, would suck. Because then I'd need full-time care, and likely by "loved ones". That would be awful, for many reasons.

#1 This would mean my family would have to support me, fiscally and physically. My mother has spent years working her arse off so I could go to university and eventually get a job and earn my own keep. She's really resentful at this period of time that I'm not graduating in less than four years, and fully expects me to support her at some period in the future, I imagine. If she had to take care of me like this now, her resentment and disappointment would become full-blown and my family would bear the brunt of her anger.

#2 I would become really depressed. Aside from the above-mentioned situation, there's also the fact that none of my family really know how to amuse me or keep me out of depression. I do that myself by writing (creation always makes me better) and reading (internalizing new ideas helps distract the mind). Being unable to do neither for myself, I would need endless entertainment, preferrably by having someone read stuff to me with colourful commentary that isn't retarded juvenile humour. Out of my entire family, I should think only my dad would be able to do this.

However, knowing my family though, they'd probably treat me like some child who needed this tender loving care and the moment they start their retarded cooing I will wish to Heaven that there was no such thing as paralysis, just death.

I think it's horrible to be perfectly functional mentally, yet have people treat you like some sub-human creature. It's bad enough the way they talk to me when I see them at reunion, quizzing me sometimes like I don't have an answer, I shudder to think how they'd treat me when I really just can't answer.

Worse still would be all the ideas internally that would have absolutely no chance to come out if I were paralyzed. I think that a life without writing would just be so miserable, I might as well just die. I would like to feel a pen in my fingers, a sheet of paper under my hand. To hear the scritch of the tip against the surface and to create meaningful markings upon the blank canvas. I'd probably take forever just to write one word, but that would be worth it - just being able to write. It would give me a way to exercise my mind, and if I could work my hand, I'm sure that eventually, I could work the rest of my body, too.

But left at my family's mercy, I would probably just wilt, completely unable to stand up for myself and unable to help them deal with my situation.

That's a frightening thought. All the more reason for me not to get into situations where I could possibly fuck myself up that badly.
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
So I have friends who're into punk. And not even just the music, since the genre is more about the philosophy than it is about the music. It's been described to me as "1% talent, 99% emotion".

Punk to me is like this futile waste of energy by people who're angry, with or without a reason and just have to expend that somehow, someway. The jamming on stage, the lack of musicality in my ears (no matter that I like the beat and harsh sounds) and most of all, the moshing - I've only ever moshed once, at a Finger 11 concert, and there were so many people, it didn't matter, but I question the reasons why a few people would choose to shove each other around.

The last couple of punk shows I went into, I felt like I was watching a bunch of children in a sandbox. The moshpit was that small, and there were that few people.

While I don't find violence as a whole all that distasteful, it's got to have a reason and a resolution. I can be confrontational when I want to be, and sometimes I do want to pick arguments, at least to clear the air and straighten things out, but in general, if put into a physically violent situation, I would probably have to go for the offender's jugular.

Last night, I watched SLC Punk. Overall, it was a somewhat amusing, decent coming-of-age movie, and the documentary bits served a little to help me understand this peculiar subculture. I've decided I like it for the purpose it serves, but Geezzuz, does it ever remind me of my younger days, being an angsty piece of shit trying to buck the system, or assert my position outside of it - mostly because I was outside of it in the first place.

It totally reminded me of my Post-Modern Novel class: I have such a love-hate relationship with post-modernism for the endless string of questions it brings, and almost complete lack of a singular answer. When there's a system, it just gets displaced in favour of another system because it's flawed, which then becomes displaced because it's flawed, and it never ends. But we have to pick anyway, it's a time when we have to decide for ourselves: what do we want? How do we want to view life? How do we compromise ourselves, and is there any solution which makes us happy? Or is it a complete world of flux with no end in sight, therefore a hopeless fight?

If I hadn't been watching with a couple of guys in the same room, I probably would have cried at the ending, because it was powerful, and I just hate it when things like that happen to people like it did to Bob. It brought back memories, not like, bad ones, nor were they good, but necessary ones. It's a realization that there never is a truly free state of being: if you're out of the system you have problems; if you're in the system you have problems.

It's all a matter of time. Eventually, the energy has to be used for something. Rebellion makes people, but taken too far, it's ineffectual, and dissipates. And what a shame when all that energy dissipates into nothing.

And how beautiful when it's used towards a dream of the future, no matter how selfish, how much of a change. So we move on.
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
I forget patience very often. I forget that some things take time, and not everything happens instantaneously. I get too caught up in the consumer world where for a sum of money I can get anything I want right after I go to the cashier.

Today, since I don't want to go out to the Market, I've decided to stay home for now and since I've no desire to work on my readings, I instead got out onto my balcony to work on my compost heap.

It's been suffering some neglect, and it's my fault. A couple of rainstorms ago, I left it open, and since it's a bin, it started to flood. I deemed it a failure when I couldn't remove the water properly, but at the suggestions of many others, I just covered it up with a plastic bag when it's raining, and the rest of the time I opened it up to let the water evaporate.

"The water has to evaporate SOMETIME" ~ [livejournal.com profile] lady_zip

So, most of it has. I've been throwing in more stuff, but the rambutans and lychees from the last month still haven't broken down completely (you can find the lychee seeds!). Probably because there aren't enough bugs and microbes in there to help the breakdown process.

Today, I'm sitting out there, and as I've noted before, the dirt has clumped together, by their own will! I told you, the dirt is alive! Here I thought it was just the lychees and rambutans unrotted, but I started hacking at the lumps with my spade and they broke down.

So I'm going to spend a while on my balcony making sure all the lumps are broken down and the dirt is well stirred. It takes some time and some effort, and even some monotony, but it's satisfying to see it all eventually break down.

It all works out. Just patience. Chopping away at the dirt and breaking it down.


And, hrm, I completely forgot about the onion on top of the fridge. Couple of 'em are rotting and a couple others are, well, growing. *roffles*
jhameia: ME! (Call To Arms)
Yesterday, I went out with [livejournal.com profile] sidewalk_slug and everytime I go out with [livejournal.com profile] sidewalk_slug, we always seem to end up going to Venus Envy, and dammit, do I ever become a reckless consumer with him! I bought an Oscar Wilde book, a pride flag, a pair of Socks With Attitude that read "Fuck My Socks Off" and a button.

I love buttons. I have a bag where I attached all the buttons I have. I love buttons with slogans, especially those I believe in. I'll list them down someday.

This new button reads: Speak Your Mind, Even if Your Voice Shakes

I think it's kind of obvious by now that in class, I talk a lot. If the teacher says, "does anybody have any comments?" and no one comments, I'll be the first one to go. If someone is making a comment, chances are high that I'll be responding to the comment. If the prof has a question and I know the answer, I'll be the first to raise my hand.

It's not even just talking, but I probably sound extremely opinionated. I wouldn't be surprised if some of my classmates found me rude.

I had a classmate like that. She was also rude to me, but outside of class, we found each other pretty cool. Other classmates didn't like her because she was stand-offish and a little disrespectful, but I found her okay.

Another classmate spoke up often, and she tended to have opinions that others considered to be extremely immature. They never said it to her face, but one day they were talking about her and found she was behind them.

It is the fear of others' thoughts that keep us silent, and while it is true that discretion is the better part of valour, in an academic environment, one should have the freedom to express thoughts without fear. One should have the strength to believe in what one says, to think it through, to act upon it.

I know that others still are intimidated by people like me who talk with such strong opinions. They're afraid we'll question them, challenge them, beat them down. This happened in my Feminism & Orientalism class, where a couple of grad girls got into an argument, and one of them gave up and quit the class. My fellow undergrad quit the class right after, too intimidated to continue. In the end, there were just five of us - one of us was most quiet. One day, I went to hang out with her and another of us, and she said, "I just get so scared and I don't know what to say."

My other classmate said, "Just say anything; just respond. You might contribute something, you never know."

"That's what I'm trying to do. I once told this to Lindsay [another classmate], how nervous I was to respond and how awkward I felt responding, and she said to me, 'well, how do you think we feel when no one responds to us?' I never forgot that, so that's why I'm trying to speak up more."

And Lindsay's right: she's very opinionated, and she stutters a lot. Her presentations must be a struggle to go through, because she stumbles over her words so much. I used to get impatient with her. Further on, I began to respect her more, because she's gone through an entire undergrad and getting her grad degree with this very mild handicap, and she doesn't let the handicap stop her, she keeps right on speaking up because she believes in what she says.

We DO get nervous when we're the only ones talking in class - where's our feedback? Are we right or are we so wrong no one bothers to correct us?

In a previous class, towards the end our professor had to take medical leave, and another prof replaced her. He tried so hard to engage the class, waiting long seconds of complete silence, and no one wanted to answer. At that point I was weary of talking to the professor all the time and wanted to give other people the chance to talk, but no one was talking! So to not waste the professor's time, I answered all the questions so he wouldn't feel so bad. I felt so awkward.

In my third year, I went into fourth year courses and that made things SO much better. The most unassuming people can have the most incredible insight if they were given the encouragement to speak up and had someone to bounce their ideas off. It's amazing to be in a class where everyone has something to contribute to the discussion, and it's wonderful to hear ideas going around.

In the bigger picture, we shouldn't let fear run our thoughts and control our voices. If there is something you believe in, speak up, even if your voice shakes!
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
A friend of mine remarked the other day how I really like touching people physically. Everytime I meet a friend, I'll give them a hug. Before they leave me, I give them a hug. I don't really touch people otherwise normally, but on occasion I do love a good cuddle with the people I trust most.

So this morning I was dwelling on this, and I remembered something that happened to me in my first year in Halifax.

I was walking down South Park St. on my way to Spring Garden Rd, passing the front of an apartment block (Haligonians will probably know what I'm talking about), and walking towards me were a group of adolescent girls. They couldn't have been older than fourteen. I don't know how to gauge age anymore.

One of the girls looked like the "different" one of the group. She wasn't talking to them, just walking with them. I wouldn't say she was differently-abled, but I got the feel of it from her. Mostly because she was the one walking right in front of me, and when I moved to the side to let her pass, she moved in front of me.

I moved to the left, she followed suit. Right, and she still blocked me.

You could tell it was done on purpose, judging by the smile on her face. I don't know why she did that - maybe just to aggravate. Maybe just to see me try to push her aside.

But it was clear she was going to block my path, so I threw my arms around her into a hug.

Her friend burst out into laughter, but she hugged me back and when I let her go, I think I patted her on the head and said something to the effect of "have a nice day." Or maybe I didn't say anything. This all happened in the space of a few seconds.

While they walked away, I heard her friends say, "that was awesome!" and in two seconds I hear running steps towards me.

I turned around, and she was bolting towards me with her arms wide open, so I opened my arms too, and she hugged me tightly. I hugged her back, and then she stepped back, grinned at me and ran back to her friends.

I never met her again.
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
I'm sick. Not as in violent-fever-fainting-shaking kind of sick, but more miserable congested-nose-sore-throat-that-feels-dry-and-needs-constant-water kind of sick. Seems my cup is always empty when I need water and I could've sworn, I just filled it not five minutes ago, and I'm not going to class because everytime I sit in that room, the air-conditioning makes my nose runny and I don't need my nose runnier than it already is.

So, I'm going to sit here at my computer and give you a rundown of my social life this past week. It's been extremely exciting.



Saturday, which really means Sunday morning. )



Sunday Proper )



Monday @ the Bathhouse )



Tuesday @ Tribeca )



Wednesday with Malaysians )




No more. No more after this. I had a motherfucker of a sore throat last night and runny nose from hell this morning, which got better, but during the course of the day I got heavy-headed and had to miss class because the air-conditioning really messes up my nose sometimes.

But either way, I promised Andrea I'd go see her play, and she has such a beautiful voice. So Elie and I headed out, but we left after her act.

Tomorrow I've got a coffee date with Stephanie.

Saturday, lunch and Elie's last downtown night.

Sunday, SMU Drama Society meeting.

Things should die down after this.

They better anyway.

Dirt.

May. 14th, 2006 01:06 pm
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
I feel the need to talk about my dirt.

Not the regular dust that settles on any flat surface in this apartment, no, that goes without saying it'll happen since I shed so damn much. No, I'm gonna talk about my compost heap.

My Compost Heap )

Let me discuss the history of my fascination with dirt in this manner.

My History with Compost Heaps )

I'm not find of dirt getting under my fingernails, nor do I like creepy-crawlies (except earthworms, earthworms are cool in my book), but I like working with earth. I live on the 14th floor, so I figure, this will be a good start to having anything close to a garden.

I watch my compost heap every day, or at least, every other day. Sometimes the bin is outside, usually when the weather is fairly warm, or at least wet. Sometimes the bin is inside, next to the heater because I hear heat helps the decomposting.

The Living Dirt )

There are definite conveniences for having a compost heap. My table's next to the balcony door, so I brought in the bin, ate lychees and dumped the lychee skins into the bin while sitting down in the comfort of my chair.

I don't really know what to do with the dirt once the bin gets to full capacity. Maybe I'll start growing stuff.

Bulbs. Yes.
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
So, different coloured people would have different coloured skin, right? What would happen if, in a communal changing room, you turned to someone next to you and exclaimed, "Hey! Our nipples are the same colour!"

What are romantic bones made of?

If women are so liberated, why do we still worry about how we look like?

What's the real difference between men and women, anyhow?

Are there anymore sacred matriarchies in the world today?

What was up with those Romans?

And those Greek gays?

Does eating carrots really help you see better?

The ideal man for a woman has these characteristics: eligible, single, straight. Pick two.

Isn't Streamline such a fun song?
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
Sometimes people put up a good front by they start seeing each other. Shouldn't this good front become a part of the whole personality instead of being dropped out as they grow more comfortable with each other? Why put on the front at all?

If a certain thing or action is based on common sense, why do people still disagree on it?

A lot of people don't eat dog on account that doggies can be pets. Do people who own pigs as pets refuse to eat meat on the same grounds? (Fuck, if I see a "Poor doggies" in response to how some peoples eat dog again....)

What would philosophy - indeed, the whole Western civlization - have been like if Plato had been a woman?

These days, if we get upset with another country, we could just terminate trade relations with them. Why do we still send in armies and declare war?

What DO cats call their vaginas?

The Victorians were strait-laced, and pretended sex didn't exist. How come so many Victorian families had so many kids?

If some rules are aboslute, do they vanish when their absoluteness is challenged?

We have double standards - are there such things as triple standards? Quadruple standards? How many degrees can we go?
jhameia: ME! (Illuminated Idea)
There was a woman who once posed on a chair at a dining table, upon which stood a glass of some white liquid and a plate of rice with some vegetables on top.

Soon after the picture was circulated, people began to say that the glass held semen and the plate of rice with the vegetable artfully arranged on it was meant to represent the vagina. They censured her for her artistic representation, speculated ill on her behaviour and called her a dirty-minded pervert.

The woman was asked by a commentator, "People don't believe you when you say it's a glass of barley water and that you normally serve rice with vegetables. Does that glass really contain semen? And did you mean to represent the vagina on the plate?"

The woman, incredulous, replied, "do you say that because you truly believe it, or do you say that to be funny? And if you say that because you truly believe it, what do your thoughts speak about you?"

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12 131415161718
19 2021222324 25
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios